By Michel Fortin
July 10th, 2002
An interesting debate is raging among copywriters, web designers and content providers about the key differences, if any, between writing copy for the web versus writing content.
According to prolific copywriter Nick Usborne, a survey conducted among the readers of his email newsletter “Excess Voice,” which is available at nickusborne.com, offers some interesting results. They seem to be split almost three ways: one-third consists of copywriters, another content writers and the final third both.
This is an important debate, I believe, since all online copy is content but not all content is copy. And that’s a real problem.
Most designers, webmasters and writers develop content for their websites in a way to educate their visitors. They also write it with the notion that “content is king,” “content raises search engine rankings,” “content makes a website sticky” and so on.
That’s all fine and good. But in my estimation, web content fails when it strives only at informing the reader, and lacks important elements that take the reader “by the hand” and compels them to do something — anything, including the simple act of reading.
In other words, while some may compel our attention, many sites fail to propel our actions, too. And their owners often scream, “Why is my site not producing any sales,” “why is it so heavily trafficked but getting such a poor response” or “why are people leaving so quickly (or after they got what they came for)?”
Well, if content was king, copy should be the castle.
The Internet is not a traditional medium in the broadcast sense. It is intimate, dynamic and interactive. People are more involved when reading the content of a website than reading a conventional print publication or watching a TV commercial. With the Internet, people also have a powerful weapon, and they usually never think twice about using it when the need confronts them: their mouse.
So, the idea is this: forget about writing content, at least in the traditional sense. Think copy. Think content that compels the reader to do something, even if it’s just to continue reading.
According to Atomica.com, “copy” is defined as “the words to be printed or spoken in an advertisement.” (And “advertisement” is defined as “a notice or announcement designed to attract public patronage.” It’s selling something, in other words.)
But the word “content,” on the other hand, is defined as “the subject matter of a written work, such as a book or magazine.” And keep in mind that there’s no mention of the Internet, here.
Nevertheless, this is why I submit that, with its multitude of links and hypertexts, the web transforms the passive reader into an active, responsive participant. (Make that “response-able.”)
A book or magazine is limited by its front and back covers. The web, however, is not. If your content does not strive at getting the reader to do something, whether it’s to buy, join, subscribe, call, email, fill out a form, download, click or whatever, then you need to seriously rethink your content and the words you use.
Here’s my explanation of the difference between content and copy.
Content informs. Copy invites. Even if content invites readers to keep reading, it’s still selling an idea. It’s still calling for some kind of action. And it’s still copy, in my opinion.
If your web page is only meant to inform people, like some kind of book, it’s content. (And like the closing of a book once it’s read, the only action left is to close the browser window.) But if it contains links to other parts of your website, then it’s copy. And you need to write your content with that mindset.
Ultimately, write your content by incorporating a direct response formula that compels and propels your readers to act. Don’t leave them hanging. Take them by the hand. In your content, integrate a call for some kind of action, in other words. Ask your reader to “buy now,” “join today,” “get this” or “download that …”
… Or better yet, at least ask them to simply “click here.”
![]()
Michel Fortin is a copywriter, author and consultant dedicated to turning businesses into powerful magnets. His specialties are long copy, email and web sales letters. Subscribe to his FREE monthly email newsletter by visiting the Success Doctor Web site.
Related Posts:
- 8 Tips for Persuasive Copywriting That Sells - TweetWhen you are writing copy for your website, your whole mission should be to convince people to do something you want them to do –...
- Guide to Optimizing Your Landing Page Copy - TweetThe mission of your landing page is to entice the site visitor to stay, look around, and do what you want them to do (ie:...
- How Fresh Content Can Increase Your Website Traffic - TweetRegardless of how fabulous your online store is, there are a few basic things that you can do as a new site owner to ensure...
- 13 Irresistible Headlines That Suck People In - TweetGetting anyone’s attention today is a difficult task. There are so many distractions and so much competition for consumers’ attention that it’s nearly impossible to...
- 7 Tips for Creating Unique Content That Doesn’t Suck - TweetAs bloggers, we’ve all struggled with the following question at one point or another: “What can I write about now?” Sometimes it feels like all...

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
Read you article with a bit of smile on my face. You basically managed to summarise in this post something that took me a lot of reading and weeks to find out for myself through trial and error. It is amazing how few real web copy writers are out there. Very nice post!
Daniel-
Just for clarification purposes, the article was actually a guest post by Michel Fortin back in 2002. In my opinion, though, it’s a timeless post that, at the very least, makes the most important distinctions between content, copy and sales.
You’ve got to get your readers to take action on something, not just make them think “geez, what a great article.”
We all need to be reminded about that occasionally while we’re stuck in the writing great content tunnel.
Check out Fortin’s site here:
Success Doctor
You must log in to post a comment.